Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.38:5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? 38:6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;  38:7When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?     38:9 When I made the cloud the garment thereof, and thick darkness a swaddlingband for it, 38:10 And brake up for it my decreed [place], and set bars and doors, 38:11And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?

Van Allen Radiation Belts

Incorrect Assumptions in Astrophysics      Michael Gmirkin -

Excerpt below, link to entire article at end:

Is all well within the field of astronomy, or have astronomers been misled by their trusting acceptance of a myriad of unproven foundational assumptions leading to extreme, bizarre (and possibly quite wrong) conclusions?

... many stars and galaxies are so distant that accurate absolute measurements of primary properties are nearly or completely beyond humanity’s current technological capability to assess. As such, several of astronomers' " absolute" measurements are in fact calculated measurements. They are extrapolated from related actual data based upon assumptions about how those data relate to properties that cannot be directly measured.

In order to calculate "absolute luminosity" (an estimation of the quantity of light originally emitted from a star or galaxy), astronomers must make calculations from the "apparent luminosity" based upon assumed distance to the source.

An article, from Sky and Telescope, appears to recognize the precarious situation that low-quality estimations of distance put astronomers in:

A bedrock problem in astronomy is simply figuring out how far away things are. Practically everything else about an object - its true size, its energy output - all the stuff you have to know to understand it - depends on simply knowing how far away it is. And even now, the poor quality of many astronomical distances remains a nagging problem. [Emphasis added]

If the underpinning assumption of ultra-luminous astronomy (and much of the Big Bang model) is found to be incorrect, then it may be necessary for astronomers to radically revise their understanding of the universe.                                      

Link to article

Star speeds are not a problem when the thickness of the universe is seen to be what

it really is, that is, LESS than half a light day thick ( eight billion mile radius.)

Jhn 3:12 If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you [of] heavenly things?

The Copernicus Model     of the Universe was generally accepted by all until the early 17th century.  It reveals the universe to be much smaller than modern science insists.   The thickness of the universe is LESS than half a light day thick (eight billion mile radius.)   The distance to the sun was calculated to be approximately 3 million miles from earth.